EPISODE 4: Re-ly Subgroup analysis: Renal Impaired and Diabetic Patients

Prof N Tsabedze 

2 clinical CPD points of MCQ at > 70% pass rate

Name:
Surname:
MP Number:
Email address:
Contact number:

Question 1
How long has it been since the data from RE-LY® demonstrated superior efficacy and safety for dabigatran vs warfarin? At least:

Question 2
Which subgroups were evaluated in the RE-LY® study?
Question 3
What did ATHERO-AF evaluate?
Question 4
Which oral anticoagulant in ATHERO-AF was associated with the highest decline in renal function?

Question 5
Which oral anticoagulant in ATHERO-AF was associated with the least amount of decline in renal function?

Question 6
What is the cause of renal function decline associated with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)?

Question 7
True or false: In ATHERO-AF, dabigatran demonstrated the least amount of renal decline, potentially suggesting less harm to the kidney

Question 8
Does renal function status significantly influence the efficacy and safety of dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg vs. warfarin?

Question 9
Is the risk of major bleeding significantly increased by the presence of renal impairment in AF patients treated with dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg vs. warfarin?

Question 10
Dabigatran 110 mg should be reserved for:

Question 11
True/False: Diabetes should be a concern when aiming to optimally anticoagulate AF patients with dabigatran
Question 12
Is the risk of stroke/SE significantly increased in AF patients with diabetes treated with dabigatran vs. warfarin?
Question 13
What do the p-values for interaction imply for dabigatran in patients with/without diabetes?
Applicant details: Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd, 407 Pine Ave, Randburg. Tel: +27 (011) 348-2400. Cpy. Reg. No. 1966/008618/07.PC-ZA-101362. Expiry Date: July 2023

Disclaimer: To qualify for 4 cpd points, you must complete Episode 4 and 6
If you have any queries or would like to follow-up on your CPD certificate, please email Corporate@lepetta.co.za